GST Lawyer & Consultant in Muzaffarpur: Constitutional Remedies & High Court Litigation
GST Lawyer in Muzaffarpur Protecting the Commercial Interests of Suta Patti, Bela Estate & Motijheel
GST Lawyer in Muzaffarpur , as the administrative headquarters of the Tirhut Division, is the nexus of trade in North Bihar. However, enforcement actions by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax often transgress the boundaries of natural justice. We challenge the very vires of proceedings, ensuring that the Due Process of Law is strictly adhered to.
Jurisdictional Expertise: Why Local Counsel is Insufficient
In matters of Fiscal Statutes, the jurisdiction of the Muzaffarpur Civil Court is severely barred under Section 162 of the CGST Act. Seeking relief from a local civil lawyer for a GST demand is legally futile.
The remedy lies exclusively with:
Advocate Tabish Ahmad possesses the Right of Audience before the Patna High Court, enabling him to seek immediate stays on arbitrary recovery proceedings initiated by the Muzaffarpur authorities.
Core Legal Competencies for Muzaffarpur Businesses
GST Lawyer in Muzaffarpur provide relief through Extraordinary Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, bypassing ineffective lower remedies when fundamental rights are violated.
1. Challenging Illegal Bank Attachment (Section 83)
The Issue: The Department invokes Section 83 to provisionally attach bank accounts pendente lite (during pending proceedings).
Legal Defense: We rely on the landmark judgment of Radha Krishan Industries vs. State of H.P. to argue that attachment is a “Draconian Measure” and must be the exception, not the rule. We challenge the order on the grounds that there is no “Tangible Material” to form an opinion that revenue is at risk.
2. Defense Against Input Tax Credit (ITC) Denial
The Issue: For the textile traders of Suta Patti, ITC blockage due to supplier default (Fake Invoicing) is critical.
Legal Doctrine: We invoke the doctrine of Lex Non Cogit Ad Impossibilia (The law does not compel a man to do that which is impossible). We cite Suncraft Energy to assert your Vested Right to ITC under Section 16(2)(c).
3. Writ of Mandamus for Refunds
The Issue: Rejection of Inverted Duty Refund claims for manufacturing units in Bela Industrial Estate.
Legal Remedy: We file for a Writ of Mandamus, commanding the department to adjudicate the refund claim within a time-bound period, along with statutory interest under Section 56.
4. Anticipatory Bail & Arrest Protection
The Issue: Allegations of tax evasion exceeding ₹5 Crores leading to potential arrest under Section 132.
Legal Remedy: We move for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the CrPC. We argue that the power to arrest is distinct from the necessity to arrest, citing D.K. Basu guidelines to resist custodial interrogation.
Advocate Tabish Ahmad possesses the Right of Audience before the Patna High Court, enabling him to seek immediate stays on arbitrary recovery proceedings initiated by the Muzaffarpur authorities.
Why the Business Community of Muzaffarpur Trusts Advocate Tabish Ahmad
In a legal landscape crowded with general practitioners, Advocate Tabish Ahmad stands apart as a Specialized Constitutional Tax Counsel. Here is why leading industrialists from Bela Estate and wholesale giants of Suta Patti choose our chambers:
Advocate Tabish Ahmad possesses the Right of Audience before the Patna High Court, enabling him to seek immediate stays on arbitrary recovery proceedings initiated by the Muzaffarpur authorities.
Client Testimonials
Hear from business leaders across Muzaffarpur who have successfully defended their rights with our legal counsel
"Our company faced a ₹47 lakh demand notice with only 7 days to respond. We were panicking. Advocate Tabish not only filed the appeal but got an immediate stay from the High Court. Our bank accounts were never touched. Professional, prompt, and powerful representation."
"My GST registration was cancelled without proper hearing. Every CA said 'too late, apply fresh.' Tabish Sir filed a Writ Petition arguing violation of Article 19(1)(g). The High Court restored our registration within 3 weeks. Exceptional knowledge of constitutional law."
"The Department issued a Section 132 summons alleging ₹8 crore tax evasion. I was terrified of arrest. Advocate Tabish obtained Anticipatory Bail within 48 hours and later proved in High Court that the entire calculation was erroneous. Case dismissed. Forever grateful."
Advocate Tabish Ahmad
LL.M (Taxation) | NALSAR Certified
Practicing Counsel, High Court of Judicature at Patna
📍 Chambers
Near Patna High Court
Opposite Maurya Lok Complex
Patna – 800001
(Serving Muzaffarpur Daily)